Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed In 2023

silicon valley bank

Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed? The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was the second largest bank failure in the history of US banking. Banks are vulnerable to failure because they take in deposits that are redeemable on request, and their assets such as loans and securities are illiquid and Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed?.

If depositors want to withdraw their money at the same time and the bank cannot meet this demand, it may have to sell its securities. If the value of these securities has fallen since they were purchased by the bank, it may not have enough assets to cover its deposits.

SVB’s deposit base consisted of many customers whose deposits were well in excess of the deposit insurance upper limit of $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, and it had the second highest proportion of uninsured deposits among large US banks.

Its deposit growth since 2020 had been impressive, but this growth was accompanied by a high proportion of deposits invested in hold-to-maturity securities, which were illiquid.

Silicon valley bank what happened?

Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse was caused by a high proportion of uninsured deposits and a large proportion of deposits invested in hold-to-maturity securities.

How significant was the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank?

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was the largest bank failure in the United States since the global financial crisis, and the second largest in US banking history.

What was Silicon Valley Bank’s role in the banking industry?

Silicon Valley Bank was a banker to about 50% of all venture capital-funded technology and life sciences companies in the United States. It was also the 16th largest bank in the United States at the end of 2022

Why are banks vulnerable to failure?

Banks are vulnerable to failure because demand deposits are redeemable on request and bank assets such as loans and securities are illiquid. Banks take in deposits with a short maturity and invest them in securities and loans with a long maturity, and if lots of depositors want to withdraw their money at the same time, the bank may not have enough assets to cover its deposits.

What is deposit insurance and how does it reduce bank runs?

Deposit insurance is a form of protection provided by governments to depositors in the event that a bank fails. In the United States, standard deposit insurance is up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, and in the UK it is £85,000. Deposit insurance reduces bank runs by providing small depositors with the confidence that their deposits are protected.

Read More Important information for Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed.

Why did silicon valley bank fail & why did silicon valley bank collapse?

Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed
Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed

SVB’s second vulnerability was that a large proportion of its deposits were invested in hold-to-maturity (HTM) securities, which are fixed-income investments that are intended to be held until they mature, Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed?

This means that they are not marked-to-market, unlike securities held for trading or available-for-sale securities. The value of HTM securities is therefore not affected by fluctuations in interest rates or market conditions. However, the downside is that they cannot be sold easily or at a profit if the bank needs to raise cash quickly. As interest rates rose in early 2023, the value of SVB’s HTM securities fell sharply.

This meant that the bank’s balance sheet became unbalanced, as its liabilities (deposits) remained fixed, while the value of its assets (HTM securities) fell.

This is similar to what happened to many banks during the global financial crisis of 2007-2009, when they held large amounts of subprime mortgage-backed securities that became illiquid and lost value and still Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed?

SVB’s management tried to sell some of its HTM securities to raise cash, but this only worsened the situation, as it led to a further decline in the value of these securities. In addition, the bank’s customers became increasingly worried about its solvency and began to withdraw their deposits, Yes it’s the one of the main reason, what are the other reason for Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed?

The combination of these factors led to a run on the bank, with many of its customers withdrawing their deposits at the same time. SVB was unable to meet these withdrawals, as it did not have enough liquid assets to do so. As a result, the bank was forced to declare bankruptcy and was taken over by the FDIC, which will liquidate its assets and pay off its depositors up to the $250,000 limit.

SVB’s failure has raised concerns about the stability of the US banking system, as well as the risks associated with holding large amounts of uninsured deposits and illiquid securities. It has also highlighted the importance of deposit insurance in protecting small depositors from bank runs.

While SVB’s failure was not caused by the same factors that led to the global financial crisis, it serves as a reminder that banks are vulnerable to sudden shifts in market conditions and customer behavior, and that regulatory oversight and deposit insurance are crucial in maintaining financial stability.

Silicon valley bank collapse explained? A Simple Explanation of the Bank’s Downfall

In March 2023, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), a midsize California lender, sent shock waves throughout the global financial system.

After clients withdrew $42 billion in a single day, regulators attempted to salvage what remained of SVB, which turned out to be the second-largest bank failure in US history after Washington Mutual in 2008.

SVB’s vulnerabilities weren’t super complicated; there were clear signs of basic corporate mismanagement that proved to be an existential flaw. SVB’s downfall highlights a cacophony of missed warning bells, which were not the fault of any one person or system but rather the result of multiple factors.

SVB was a financial institution and a status symbol among Bay Area businesses and individuals. It catered to a world of venture capitalists known as much for their astounding wealth as their hearty appetite for risk. To bank with SVB was to be part of an elite club that embraced a uniquely Silicon Valley ethos that champions boldness, growth, and disruption.

SVB grew at a breakneck pace, with assets nearly quadrupling between 2018 and 2021. It was the nation’s 16th largest bank by the end of 2022, with $209 billion in assets, which should have set off alarm bells on its own. When banks grow quickly, there are red flags everywhere because the management’s capacity and the bank’s compliance systems seldom grow at pace with the rest of the business.

In fact, as early as 2019, four years before SVB’s downfall, the Federal Reserve warned the bank about its insufficient risk-management systems, according to the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times.

It’s not clear whether the Fed, SVB’s primary federal regulator, took action on that warning. The central bank is reviewing its oversight of SVB. SVB’s vulnerability was due to its over-reliance on uninsured deposits, which made it extremely unstable. Virtually all — 97%, according to data from Wedbush Securities — of SVB’s deposits were uninsured.

Typically, US banks finance 30% of their balance sheets with uninsured deposits, making SVB’s figure “a crazy amount,” says Kairong Xiao, a professor at the Columbia Business School.

SVB was known for working with young tech start-ups that other banks may have shunned. When those start-ups flourished, SVB grew alongside them. The bank also managed the personal wealth of those start-ups’ founders, who were often light on cash as their fortunes were tied to equity in their companies.

This made the bank geographically and industry-segment concentrated, and that industry segment was extremely sensitive to interest rates. SVB held an unusually large proportion (55%) of its customers’ deposits in long-dated Treasuries. Those are typically super safe assets, and SVB was hardly alone in loading up on bonds in the era of near-zero interest rates.

However, those bonds’ market value decreases when interest rates go up, creating a ticking time bomb.

Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed: How the U.S. Government Responded to Protect Depositors.

SVB Financial Group’s collapse was a result of a bank run that occurred after the bank was forced to sell off its bond portfolio at a loss to cover withdrawal requests.

The bank’s clients, which consisted mainly of startups and smaller tech companies, had deposited large amounts of cash during the pandemic, which the bank used to buy U.S. treasuries and government-backed mortgage securities.

However, the bank’s cash position ran dry when several customers rushed to withdraw capital, causing a panic in the markets and sparking the bank run.

The Federal Reserve’s aggressive rate hikes, aimed at combating rising inflation, also contributed to SVB’s collapse. The bank’s longer-term treasuries were yielding just 1.79%, while the 10-year was yielding closer to 4%, leading to losses when the bank was forced to sell some of its longer-term treasuries to cover increased withdrawal requests.

The collapse of SVB Financial Group was the biggest banking collapse since the 2008 financial crisis. However, the U.S. government stepped in over the weekend to inject liquidity into the situation and make depositors whole.

The FDIC’s deposit insurance fund will cover depositors, and the Fed announced plans to create a new Bank Term Funding Program to protect institutions impacted by the crash of SVB Financial stock. The move aims to build back confidence in the banking system and does not constitute a bailout, so shareholders will not recoup losses, and taxpayers will not suffer.

Summary of: Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed.

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) failed due to having a high proportion of uninsured deposits and a large proportion of deposits invested in hold-to-maturity securities.

SVB had served as a banker to about 50% of all venture capital-funded technology and life sciences companies in the US. As of the end of 2022, SVB was the 16th largest bank in the US and had less than 1% of US bank assets.

Banks are intermediaries, and they are prone to failure because they take in deposits that have a short maturity and invest them in securities and loans that have a long maturity.

Depositors can withdraw all their deposits from the bank at the push of a button, while bank assets such as loans and securities are illiquid. Banks make their money by the difference in interest rates between deposits and loans.

In case lots of depositors want to withdraw their money at the same time, a bank might not have enough assets to cover its deposits.

This is where shareholder capital comes in: it helps to absorb the fall in the value of securities, acting as a buffer. But what happens when this capital is exhausted? At this point, the bank is insolvent.

Central banks and regulators have long recognised the fragility of banks and their susceptibility to bank runs.

Standard deposit insurance is one of the measures that can reduce bank runs by small depositors. In the United States, standard deposit insurance is up to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC, 2023). The equivalent figure in the UK is £85,000 (Bank of England, 2023).

You may have got the answers of Why Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed.

what happened to silicon valley bank in simple terms

  1. Over-reliance on technology lending: Silicon Valley Bank had a disproportionate amount of its loan portfolio invested in tech startups, which left it vulnerable to the risks inherent in that sector.
  2. Lack of diversification: The bank did not sufficiently diversify its lending portfolio beyond technology startups, further exacerbating the risk.
  3. Heavy exposure to real estate: Silicon Valley Bank’s significant lending to commercial and residential real estate ventures left it exposed to the risks of a volatile real estate market.
  4. Overexpansion: The bank expanded rapidly into new markets and geographies, which put a strain on its resources and led to increased risk.
  5. Poor risk management: The bank failed to effectively manage risk, with lax underwriting standards and poor loan documentation contributing to loan losses.
  6. Weak corporate governance: The bank’s board and management failed to adequately oversee its lending practices and risk management, leading to poor decision-making and a lack of accountability.
  7. Funding challenges: The bank relied heavily on wholesale funding sources, such as deposits from other banks, which proved unstable and vulnerable to market disruptions.
  8. Regulatory issues: The bank faced regulatory challenges, including concerns about its risk management practices and compliance with anti-money laundering regulations.
  9. Exposure to the housing market collapse: The bank suffered significant losses due to its exposure to the subprime mortgage market during the 2008 financial crisis.
  10. Lack of profitability: The bank struggled to maintain profitability, with losses in some years, which undermined its ability to weather economic downturns.
  11. Leadership turnover: The bank experienced high turnover in its senior leadership, which contributed to instability and poor decision-making.

Silicon valley bank locations

Silicon Valley Bank has multiple locations in the United States and around the world. Here is a list of some of their locations:

United States:

  • Santa Clara, California
  • Tempe, Arizona
  • Boston, Massachusetts
  • Broomfield, Colorado
  • Durham, North Carolina
  • New York, New York
  • Newton, Massachusetts
  • Newton, North Carolina
  • Palo Alto, California
  • San Francisco, California
  • Seattle, Washington


  • London, United Kingdom
  • Dublin, Ireland
  • Frankfurt, Germany
  • Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Beijing, China
  • Shanghai, China
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Bengaluru, India
  • Pune, India
  • Mumbai, India
  • Toronto, Canada

Silicon Valley Bank CEO

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Timothy J. Mayopoulos is the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

tim mayopoulos
Timothy J. Mayopoulos | CEO of Silicon Valley Bank

Tim is an accomplished executive with over 35 years of financial services experience, and he was appointed as CEO and President of Silicon Valley Bank in March 2023 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Prior to this role, Tim served as the CEO of Fannie Mae from 2012 to 2018, where he successfully led the company to sustained profitability and stability after the financial crisis. Under his leadership, Fannie Mae paid $162 billion in dividends to the U.S. Treasury.

After his time at Fannie Mae, Tim joined Blend Labs, a fintech startup that provides mortgage and consumer banking technology, as its CEO from 2019 to 2023.

He helped Blend Labs become a market leader in this space. Tim has also held senior positions at other financial institutions, including Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse First Boston, and Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette.

At Silicon Valley Bank, Tim’s primary goal is to ensure the safe, smooth, and secure operations of the bank while delivering high-level services to its clients.

He also aims to continue supporting the innovation economy, which is critical to the bank’s clients’ success.

In addition to his role at Silicon Valley Bank, Tim serves on the boards of three NYSE-listed companies: Blend Labs, LendingClub, and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).

He has also advised various early-stage VC-backed companies, including Bilt Technologies and Valon Technologies.

Tim holds a degree in English from Cornell University and graduated from New York University School of Law.

He is a highly respected figure in the financial services industry and is known for his exceptional leadership skills and strategic vision.

You may like this:

I Want To Start A Business But Have No Money

Type of Business – Entity Meaning – 100% Exp

How to make an effective vision board for getting success?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top